GOP Debate Rxn

Last night's GOP debate on MSNBC was nothing less then thrilling must see TV. With Fred Thompson now out of the picture, we were left with our five remaining candidates: Mitt Romney, John McCain, Rudy Guliani, Ron Paul, and Mike Huckabee. Of course nobody said anything novel or that we hadn't heard before from them, but it was entertaining none-the-less.

As much as I think that Ron Paul is a whackjob with terrible ideas on the majority of the issues, he was the only candidate with the cojones to stand up and say that the Iraq war was a bad idea and that is has not been worth the cost, both in blood and money. Perhaps the other four candidates really, truly, deep down inside, believe that the war was a good idea. Perhaps they are just pandering to what they think the base believes. I think that the base believes that the war was a stupid idea not worth ANY lives nor ANY money. But I may just be cynical. At any rate, Paul was right there and nowhere else.

Romney solidified his gun control position in my eyes. "I am not in favor of any new legislation." Good. That's the way is should be. He also scared many of us by pointing out that a Hilary victory means a Bill in the White House "with nothing to do." Think of the damage that could be done and the havoc that could be reeked. It was pretty funny, too.

Huckabee kinda faded into the background in this one. I don't think that he is gonna manage to pull out Florida, and he'll flop on Super Tuesday. Good bye, Mike. Not so nice knowin' ya. Chuck Norris did say (not in the debate, but it was brought up here...) that McCain would die in office because he is so old. hehehe :)

McCain stood right next to Guliani and started to steal his supporters. Talking about how good of a man he is and how good of friends they are and how he lead the country through 9/11 and blah, blah, blah. Translation: This guy's gonna loose; jump on my bandwagon. Standing right next to him... Mean.

Guliani actually did okay in my opinion. Nothing really sticks out in my mind, though. That means he wasn't memorable. He wasn't memorable good nor memorable bad. So he likely didn't loose votes, but he likely didn't pick any up, either.

The big winner was obviously Romney. He dominates on the economic issues if for no other reason than people believe that his background and training makes him the guy who knows and understands the most about what is going on and how to fix it. The man made millions for himself. Not everybody can do that. He obviously has some understanding the economy that most of the rest of us lack. Including the other candidates.

So here I sit. My vote has already been cast. Nothing more I can do. Waiting for Tuesday night to come. Waiting to see who gets the bump before Super Tuesday. Just waiting....

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Joel, do you know how I might access that online? Not having network television makes it difficult for me to watch debates.

Joel said...

It should be here. An hour and a half of goodness...

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I already found it and am watching it - so thanks - by the way, does Guliani remind anyone else of George Bluth(Arrested Development)? Look, sound, ideas.....It's almost spot on.

The Wizzle said...

I'm going to try to watch that this weekend. In the meantime...

Ron Paul caught my attention during the very first debate when he dared to say that the war was a terrible idea, and that maybe - just MAYBE - some of the problems that we have in the middle east are not just because "they hate us for our freedom". Maybe some of our very own policies are not winning us friends in some of the nations there. Maybe. Rudy Giuliani practically had an epileptic fit over that, but I was so thrilled that someone said what I was thinking - and a Republican! (Because dontcha know, every Republican is in favor of the war and every Democrat is against it. Tidy, eh?) I almost fell off the couch, and I'll always love him for it.

I have also already voted (why oh why can't I vote in both primaries? I understand, I guess, but I don't want to screw things up. I just want a say in both elections! Is that so wrong?) and I will be waiting with bated breath to see how this all plays out!

Amy said...

This comment will win me some friends. I thought that going into Iraq was a good idea at the time. I still think it was justified. I think pulling out everyone next week and saying "see ya" is going to cause WAY more problems than we could imagine.

NPR said according to a study the economy was #1 issue for republicans this year, whereas the war was #1 for democrats. I vote Mitt because he's the best candidate to fix the economy in my mind. He also (like me) thinks that pulling out immediately will cause more problems than it will solve.

Anonymous said...

No, Amy, you are just like most of the Republican Canidates. Most of the canidates in general actually. I thought Iraq was a terrible idea at the time, and I rue the day we went there, and I think we've opened pandora's box. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't. So, I don't really care what happens with the war. Wow, how unamerican is that?

Regarding the Debate, I'm about halfway through it (my wife had other plans for me when she got home from work) But so far, it has felt a little like watching the Sinister Six or the Legion of Doom or Skeletor and his Minions sit around and bicker about evil things. I hate hearing people talk about consumerism. Maybe that's cause I'm a Pinko Socialist Commy. Anyways, I don't know if i can finish it, but i'll try. And I agree with Rachel - I really Like Ron Paul. He'd have my vote if I was voting for any of them. Go Ron Paul! I'm in your corner!

Anonymous said...

I wouldn't mind some discussion on consumerism. Tell me what you think. (Is pink the commy color?, I don't get that, and it has been said a couple times now.) And were you being sarcastic or do you consider yourself a socialist commy, or just cross-critisizing?